The world’s most well -known microblog platform X made a very interesting decision on shared images. Compared to this decision, an image shared on the platform can be removed if a person shows the death of a person. However, the user who will report about this will have to deal with the judgment.

Compared to the decision of X, a user who wants to remove the images of the moment of the position will have to offer a detailed death report to the platform. Moreover, this report will include the official death document of the person. However, X will have the right to negatively value the application. For example, an image that is desired to be removed, if it carries the news price, X will be able to reject the demand. Moreover, only the relatives of the deceased will be able to apply for the removal of the image.

Shouldn’t this be easier?

X’s change in its policy on violence content has created controversy in the middle of users. After all, death is a cold and painful event for everyone. In this case, does it make sense that a person who is painful will make a lot of effort for only one image? The images showing the death of a person’s death could be removed more easily.

This is obvious; Let’s say that X has already a different attitude against violence content. For example, in an incident last year, the Australian officials wanted to remove the image of an image that took place on the platform and resulted in the stabbing of a person. Compared to the authorities, the image of theology could lead to retaliation in the middle of the parties. But X rejected it. In a statement, it was declared that the abolition of the sharing was opposed to freedom of expression …