US-based technology giant Microsoft introduced its brand new operating system Windows 11 to all users a few days ago. These days, users are busy exploring the features of Windows 11, which has a more fun design, especially in terms of design. However, Microsoft’s failure to keep a promise has caused the company to react.
One of the innovations that Microsoft promised in Windows 11 was emojis with new designs. In fact, in a recent post from the official Twitter account of Windows United Kingdom, attention was drawn to how the new emojis in Windows 11 would look. However, the new emojis introduced with the latest Insider version of Windows 11 did not meet the expectations of the users. Because the emojis offered for use with the emojis shown were not very similar to each other.
This is what Windows 11’s emojis would look like
We are like 2nd at the beginning of the project, 5th in the middle of the project, and 6th at the end of the project. So which Windows 11 emoji are you?
The new emojis introduced in the latest Insider version of Windows 11 are not quite like the above. So much so that the emojis that are available have designs that many people are used to. Of course, this situation led to the reaction of users. Some even said that Microsoft cheated all users. Brandon LeBlanc, one of the senior managers of Windows Insider, made some statements on the subject.
Here’s what the emojis look like in the latest Insider version of Windows 11
In the statements made by Brandon LeBlanc, it was stated that this was never a deception. Stating that the team made a mistake and that this error will be fixed, the Microsoft manager said that the phrase “deception” was an exaggeration. . . According to LeBlanc, the new emojis will appear as mirrored. . .
Here are some reactions
Why did Windows UK trick us? They had officially shown us the Windows 11 emojis.
Are we sure that the emojis shown aren’t completely deprecated and will definitely be made available? I really like 3D emojis. . .
Here’s Brandon LeBlanc’s “you’re exaggerating” post
12494
