Marie Curie won the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1903, and in 1911, she was the only lady who lived the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1911.

However, despite all the years, the representation of women in the Nobel Awards is still quite quite a border. There are many reasons under this.

What do the data show?

The representation of women since 1901 is always low and this inequality is more obvious in the field of basic sciences. From 1901 to the present, Nobel rewards were given to 915 men and 66 women. This means that 93 %of the rewards go to men and 6.73 %go to women.

Total number; 13 were given to medicine and physiology, 5 of them were given to physiology, 8 of them were given to chemistry, 18 were given to literature, 3 economy and 19 peace branches.

As you can imagine, one of the main reasons why women receive less awards is gender roles and historical roughness.

In the past, women’s access to higher education was limited and the participation of scientific research was prevented. For example; Marie Curie had to go to Paris because her desire to do a doctor in Poland was rejected.

In addition, let’s give another example from history. In 1944, high school Meitner worked with Otto Hahn in the discovery of nuclear fission, but the Nobel reward was given only to Hahn.

Similarly, Rosalind Franklin’s contributions to the discovery of the DNA structure had not been appreciated in accordance with the long respite, even after death. On the one hand, such examples also show the shortcomings in the recognition of women’s scientific success.

There are also gender prejudices and systemic creatures.

The existence of a male dominant culture in the scientific world caused women not to be noticed in accordance with their success. They had a disadvantage by not being sufficiently represented and nominated in academic and scientific surroundings.

The prestigious research laboratories were managed by well -known male scientists, which led to the recruitment of more men than women in filling post -doctoral positions.

Unintentionally imposed a negative impact on women’s release and recognition of women’s research findings. Men refers to 56 %more than women. The possibility of attributing the ideas of women to men is higher.

In addition, the investigation of the research written by the ladies alone is the two times longer.

The issues that women face not only scientific but also in business life are associated with the Nobel reward.

There is also a price difference in the middle of gender, as in every branch. While academic life disrupts the stability of work and life, there are restrictions on mission sequence. Family obligations, having children, and family permits can face difficulties in a laboratory environment.

Personal knowledge and physical appearance again in the business life of ladies again. The trial is higher, doubt more.

However, things begin to change.

There is also a general belief that women do not like mathematics or are not beautiful in science. The studies also support this, and it turns out that women stay away from science because of education politics, role models, cultural contexts and prejudices, not women’s cognitive insufficiency.

Perceptions and life are changing, ladies are starting to destroy them. 45 %of men and about 55 %of women enter the university. Today, the number of female students studying biology is 70 %, while in 30 %of men.

We see this when we look at the number of women who receive Nobel reward. 1901-1920 (4), 1921-1940 (5), 1941-1960 (3), 1961-1980 (7), 1981-2000 (11), 2001-2020 (28), 8 women in the middle of 2021-2024 Nobel Requirements He was entitled to buy.

In this bet, naturally, there are also explanations of the Nobel reward administration.

Years ago, the prejudices are not rejected and this bet is also going to change. Three of the six committees are president and ladies in all committees.

The committees make special efforts to identify and invite women to be nominated for reward. In the coming years, they also underline that they will continue to nominate ethnic and geographic diversity.

As a result, the low representation of women’s Nobel Awards; Although it is a result of historical, social and systemic obstacles, steps have been taken in every field to correct this imbalance in recent years.

Claudia Goldin, who received the Nobel Economic Award for his work on gender inequalities in the labor market in 2023, is one of the successful examples to be given.

We expect your comments by saying that science should not recognize gender and that it is a common heritage of humanity.

You can also review these contents: