The US did not give copyright to the work created by artificial intelligence

Artificial intelligence continues to enter many areas of our lives, and it also brings some question marks. The US Copyright Office (USCO) reiterated its decision that a work of art created by an artificial intelligence cannot be copyrighted.

Human impact is an important criterion in the production part

Dr. Stephen Thaler tried to patent the A Recent Entrance to Paradise work produced by an artificial intelligence called the Creativity Machine, but in 2019, USCO gave a negative response to the patent request. Thaler objected to the decision and asked for the negative answer to be reconsidered. In a document recently released by the USCO, he reiterated his earlier decision that the AI-generated image did not contain an element of “human authorship.” According to

USCO, current copyright law is based on “the link between the human mind and creative expression.” Based on this, it is concluded that in order for a work to be protected by copyright, a human touch is required in the production process.

The law is a work although artificial intelligence Although it is created by the company, it can be interpreted differently with sufficient creative input in the production process. Thaler’s second application to the USCO is also stated to have focused on this issue, but as a result of the reviews, the board was not convinced of its sufficient creative input.