Tesla is among the world’s largest electric car manufacturers. The company has different cars, such as the Tesla Model Y, suitable for many people. Thanks to this diversity, Tesla can easily reach good sales figures around the world.
Tesla Model Y is the company’s affordable SUV model. It is especially popular thanks to its technological features and long range. According to the information revealed, the company will launch a new version of the affordable SUV.
New Tesla Model Y appeared in EPA registrations!
Tesla Model Y currently has only 3 versions. The first is RWD (rear wheel drive), the second is AWD Long Range (4×4 long range) and the third is AWD Performance (4X4 Performance version). However, another Tesla Model Y AWD version has been added to the new list published by the EPA (US Environmental Protection Agency).
This version offers a range of 279 miles according to the data in the records. This range falls slightly behind other all-wheel drive cars. It is said that the new Tesla Model Y AWD version may come as an entry level, especially since Elon Musk is not satisfied with the rear-wheel drive version.
There is no information yet on the company’s official website about the new Tesla Model Y AWD version. However, according to the allegations, the company will benefit from 4680 type cylindrical battery cells for the first time in this vehicle. In this way, the vehicle will be able to travel more efficiently despite less battery capacity.
According to another claim, Prismatic LFP cells will be used in this vehicle. In this way, the vehicle will offer a better range despite a smaller battery capacity, just like the 4680 type cylindrical battery cells. In addition, the vehicle will have two electric motors.
Tesla Model Y AWD is currently limited. An official statement is expected by the company in the coming days. So, what are your thoughts? How do you think the new version of the new Tesla Model Y will be? Or is the pattern appearing in the records just a software bug? Do not forget to share your views with us in the comments section or on the SDN Forum.
33254
