One of the world’s largest processor manufacturers, Qualcomm continues its production in the shadow of the global chip crisis. Despite the crisis affecting technological productions all over the world, the company had a successful year and continues to work on its new flagship processor.
Snapdragon 8 Gen 1+ will be the manufacturer of the expected chipset
, which will host the top-end Android phones of 2022 with the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 processor. continues to work on it. However, interesting leak information about the production line continues to come. Allegedly, the company is preparing to abandon Samsung and cooperate with TSMC in chip production.
It was previously said that a part of the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 processor will be produced by TSMC. However, it was stated that the reason for this was due to the global chip crisis. However, Qualcomm has agreed with TSMC for the production of the product, which is expected to be released in the coming months, with the name Snapdragon 8 Gen 1+.
Qualcomm previously relied on Samsung for chip manufacturing. However, the company plans to place its flagship processor in many major smartphone brands. As such, the fear of forming a supply chain in the production of the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 processor began to be experienced. Therefore, Qualcomm is expected to receive support from TSMC for the processor in question.
Although Qualcomm was affected by the global chip crisis, which is thought to be the main source of the coronavirus and the quarantine process, as a workload, it did not suffer any financial loss. In the report published last month, the company announced that they closed the 2021 fiscal year with growth despite the chip and supply crises.
The company made a big climb with Snapdragon chipsets. The company, which has agreed with important phone manufacturers about Snapdragon sets, stated that it achieved $ 5.98 billion in revenue with an increase of approximately 42 percent. It is not yet known when the company, which continues to grow rapidly, will announce its new processor.
What do you think about this issue? You can share your views with us in the comments section or on the SDN Forum.
27927
