Samsung’s graphics investment disappointing

The Exynos 2200 took a historic lead over its main competitor, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. It is a matter of curiosity what step Samsung will take for its project, which can barely pass even the Exynos 2100 chip.
 Samsung’s graphics investment disappointing
READING NOW Samsung’s graphics investment disappointing

Having made a significant investment to overcome the problems experienced in the Exynos division for years and collaborating with AMD, Samsung has so far sought the most powerful chipset of both itself and the mobile world. had begun work. The result did not please anyone.

Exynos 2200 was disappointing

When the Exynos 2200 was first announced, it was claimed that it would revolutionize the mobile world with its RDNA 2 graphics and even put the Apple A15 Bionic chipset in the dust. However, it did not go beyond a standard upgrade for the market.

Snapdragon 8 Gen1+ may come earlier

Added 2 days ago

Galaxy at the press preview attended by Erdi Özüağ It was possible to compare the S22 Ultra and Galaxy S21 Ultra models. Also, both Exynos and Snapdragon versions were compared.

In the 3DMark Wild Life test, the Exynos 2100 chip scored 6256 points, while the Exynos 2200 scored 6684 points. Already, Samsung mentioned an increase of 6 percent on the processor side and 17 percent on the graphics side, at best. This is also reflected in the scores.

Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, on the other hand, opened the scissors up to 42 percent, although the Adreno graphics unit works at lower speeds. So the Exynos 2200 chipset has way more to go. As they are still in the early stages, these differences may improve a bit.

Of course, aside from the performance side, real-time ray tracing and varifocal technologies are revolutionary for the mobile world. Samsung’s integration of these technologies in the most appropriate way may make you forget the performance difference.

  • Home
  • Mobile Technologies
  • Mobile Phones News
  • Exynos 2200 dusts

Comments
Leave a Comment

Details
177 read
okunma35476
0 comments