Qualcomm is worried: MediaTek breaks record

Dimensity 2000, which rivals Qualcomm's Snapdragon 898 processor, has been leaked with a surprising AnTuTu score. MediaTek is quite ambitious!
 Qualcomm is worried: MediaTek breaks record
READING NOW Qualcomm is worried: MediaTek breaks record

Chip manufacturers have now started the countdown to release new chipsets. The leading ones are Qualcomm and MediaTek; It will compete fiercely with Snapdragon 898 and Dimensity 2000 processors. Both processors will power next year’s flagship models.

MediaTek’s new chipset, Dimensity 2000, was recently displayed with an unprecedented score in AnTuTu tests. This processor, which will be a direct competitor to Snapdragon 898, has managed to attract attention with a score of over 1 million from the tests.

MediaTek Dimensity 2000 managed to pass 1 million on AnTuTu

MediaTek’s new processor has started to appear with concrete leaks as it approaches its introduction date. This processor, codenamed MT6983, performs quite well, although it is not fully optimized yet.

Dimensity 2000, which passed the comprehensive tests of AnTuTu, received 1002220 points on this platform. This reveals that MediaTek will have a large share of the flagship market next year. So what features will Dimensity 2000 have?

According to prominent reports, the Taiwanese manufacturer’s new chipset will be based on a 4nm process, just like Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 898 chipset. However, unlike Snapdragon 898, Dimensity 2000 goes through TSMC’s 4nm process instead of Samsung’s 4nm process.

Dimensity 2000, which is currently in mass production, will again have the same architecture as the Snapdragon 898. This processor, which will be supported by Cortex X2 on the super-large core side, will perform over 3.0 GHz.

MediaTek’s Dimensity 2000 chipset received a very ambitious score in AnTuTu tests. So what kind of processor does Qualcomm prepare? Do you think it will be able to show the same performance in Snapdragon 898? Let’s discuss in the comments.

Comments
Leave a Comment

Details
219 read
okunma21539
0 comments