Google filed an application with the US Patent and Trademark Office last Friday for its device, codenamed Rohan, for its new smartwatch called Pixel Watch. But today an interesting thing happened. A company employee forgot the prototype product, its strap and box at a restaurant in the USA.
A person who noticed this situation shared all the images of the device with technology sites and editors. Of course, there is no definitive proof that the device is real at the moment, but it is unlike any smartwatch that has been on sale before. Moreover, it coincides with the possible event images that have been leaked recently.
Google Pixel Watch first spotted!
In the past days, some images claimed to be included in the event to be held for Google Pixel Watch have leaked. Although the design and some features of the smart watch can be seen here, it was only a claim since there was no official sharing.
But today, after having dinner at the restaurant in the USA, we can say that the leaks were confirmed with the Google Pixel Watch, straps and box forgotten on the table. Because the design, straps and connection points are exactly the same.
Of course, it was very difficult to understand the size and thickness of the device from the leaked images at first. But after being seen in blood, we now know what to expect. The software of the smart watch will be Wear OS 3. On the processor side, instead of Snapdragon, an Exynos chip will be used by agreement with Samsung.
When we look at the watch, we see that it has a very compact design. There is a traditional crown on the right side and two buttons right next to it, which we are accustomed to from digital watches. In addition, its completely frameless screen is protected by 2.5D glass. In other words, we can say that it is a device with oval lines in general.
In addition, the watch appears to have an Apple Watch-like strap structure. One of the straps appears to have pins for the charging port on the connector. For this reason, it is said that the device may not support wireless charging. However, this part may have been developed for other possible apparatuses.
What do you think about this issue? Don’t forget to share your feedback with us on the SDN Forum or in the comments!
4050
