Manufacturers are working on mobile chips for their new flagships in the processor industry, which has recently entered a vicious circle and does not show a performance difference (based on high level) to users in daily use, no matter how much it develops. After Qualcomm introduced the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 long ago and officially launched it with the Xiaomi 12 series introduced yesterday, the eyes were turned to the MediaTek front. Information from the MediaTek front shows that Dimensity 9000 will be much cheaper than Snapdrgon 8 Gen 1. .
Dimensity 9000 draws attention with its price
MediaTek, which has started to close the gap with Qualcomm, which it has been competing with for years, has succeeded in producing successful processors in the entry and middle segments. However, since there is no gear representative in the upper segment, Snapdragon models are the biggest favorite of manufacturers every year. The company, which started to work to close this gap with the Dimensity series, is now launching the Dimensity 9000 model after the Dimensity 1000 series.
MediaTek, which could not catch up with the current flagship processors in the Dimensity 1000 series, was only able to catch up with Qualcomm’s previous high-end chip. However, the Dimensity 9000, which will be introduced in the coming days, manages to catch the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 with the scores it gets. This chipset, which will go through the 4nm production process, is as fast as Snapragon and achieves more successful results on the efficiency side.
In addition, another detail that makes the Dimensity 9000 one step ahead of the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 is the price. The MediaTek production processor, which will be introduced soon, is expected to have a price tag of $ 100-110. This makes it much more reasonable against the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. As a matter of fact, Qualcomm’s processor is at the level of 130-140 dollars. This makes a difference of 30 percent.
So, do you think MediaTek will be able to catch up with Qualcomm this time? Which processor manufacturer do you prefer? You can specify in the comments…
26681
