The turbulent partnership process of Elon Musk and Twitter continues to make a name for itself. Musk, who has made a name for himself in many areas with his writings on the platform, has joined Twitter as a partner. It took its place on the agenda by creating a different agenda with the attempt of
Twitter is reevaluating Elon Musk’s $43 billion purchase offer
The process, which started with Elon Musk’s partnership with a certain part of Twitter, continues in the company of unknowns. Finally, the famous businessman, who sent his offer of 43 billion dollars for the entire platform, waited, saying “the best and last offer”. Twitter management has not yet responded to Musk, one of the partners for the proposal.
On the other hand, the general consensus was that Twitter flatly rejected Musk’s offer. However, this apparently confused the management. Recently, Twitter CEO Parag Agrawal held a meeting with his employees about the latest developments and the Elon Musk agenda. In the meeting, which lasted for 25 minutes in the form of questions and answers, Agrawal confused them by saying that there was no clear answer whether the offer would be accepted or not.
The bidding process, which has been going on for a while, is kind of pending. Although he did not explain the answer, the Twitter administration continues its meetings on this issue. On the other hand, according to The Journal, management is putting the pending offer back on the table for reconsideration. So much so that, according to the information obtained from important sources, the possibility of an agreement seems high.
While this whole turbulent process continues, Twitter management has not yet responded to the latest news. When the first proposal came from Elon Musk, it was stated that the proposal would be evaluated with the promise of “careful and comprehensive review”. In the light of all these developments, it is a matter of curiosity what their response to the proposal will be.
What do you think about this issue? You can share your views with us in the comments section or on the SDN Forum.
3557
