AI-generated artwork decision from Washington

One of the new attention-grabbing topics in the field of artificial intelligence is the subject of art.
 AI-generated artwork decision from Washington
READING NOW AI-generated artwork decision from Washington

One of the new attention-grabbing topics in the field of artificial intelligence is the subject of art.

Washington made a striking decision about a work of art produced by artificial intelligence without inspiring a human work. The decision was that this work could not be copyrighted.

Remarkable copyright decision from Washington

A US court in Washington DC has ruled that an artwork created by artificial intelligence without human input cannot be copyrighted under US law.

US District Judge Beryl Howell announced that the Copyright Office rejected copyright applications for inventions created by the artificial intelligence system DABUS, and that only works by human authors can be copyrighted.

This decision reflects the legal debates about the copyright of works produced by artificial intelligence. Artificial intelligence systems can produce works without human intervention, and this situation is thought to pose new problems in terms of intellectual property laws.

Computer scientist Stephen Thaler applied for copyright for works created using the artificial intelligence system DABUS. However, the Copyright Office rejected these applications and emphasized the necessity of human authorship for copyrighting works.

Comments
Leave a Comment

Details
154 read
okunma48854
0 comments